Loading...

ROHIT BHATTACHARYA

COUNSEL

rohit.bhattacharya@singularitylegal.com

+91 84610 40599

+91 22 4976 5861 Ext. 104

Request CV

Rohit is a counsel at Singularity Legal. He specialises in advising energy & resources, construction & infrastructure, shipping & trade, and sports & entertainment companies in shareholder and joint venture disputes, operational disputes, and sovereign disputes.  

His range of experience includes advising clients in international arbitrations under various rules like ICC and SIAC; international mediations under the rules of SIMC; and in cross-border disputes before courts in India, Indonesia, Singapore, and Turkey.
 

COMMERICAL DISPUTES

Energy, Resources & Infrastructure

Arbitration

  • Representing a Singaporean and an Indian company in an arbitration concerning breach of a consortium agreement for a rig conversion project against an Abu Dhabi shipyard (SIAC Rules, Singapore seated, Singapore law)

  • Representing two Indian companies in an arbitration under a joint-venture agreement for construction of a thermal power plant against a Korean sovereign company (SIAC Rules, Singapore seated, Indian law)

  • Representing an Indian company in an arbitration concerning the termination of a contract for the construction of an ethanol and power plant in Philippines against an Australian employer and Filipino co-contractor (SIAC Rules, Singapore seated, English law)

  • Advising an Indian company for its dispute against a Turkish employer relating to the construction of a circulating fluidized bed combustion boiler in Istanbul, Turkey (ICC Rules, Turkey seated, Turkish law)

  • Representing a Singaporean and an Indian company in an ad-hoc arbitration concerning termination of a contract for conversion of a mobile offshore drilling unit to a mobile offshore production unit, against an Indian state-owned enterprise (India seated, Indian law)

  • Advising an Indian company in two ad-hoc arbitrations concerning termination of two contracts for construction of oil tankage platforms against an Indian state-owned enterprise (India seated, Indian law)

  • Advising a global litigation funder for its investment in a portfolio concerning construction all over India including freight corridor, elevated roads, scientific warehouses, hydroelectric projects, headrace tunnel, and metros (India seated, Indian law)

  • Assisting a South Korean petrochemical company in conducting an investigation with regards to its ongoing arbitration against an Indian oil and gas joint venture of three public sector undertakings (India seated, Indian law)

  • Advising an Indian company in its dispute against an Indian state-owned oil & gas entity under an EPC contract for civil construction in Lucknow (India seated, Indian law)

Litigation

  • Representing a Singaporean and an Indian company in their dispute concerning wrongful invocation of bank guarantees, and wrongful termination of a contract for conversion of a mobile offshore drilling unit to a mobile offshore production unit, against an Indian state-owned enterprise (Bombay High Court)

  • Representing a South Korean sovereign bank against an Indian oil and gas public sector undertaking in relation to Dahej Petrochemical plant (Gujarat High Court)

Private Equity & Finance

Litigation

  • Advising two Singaporean companies in their dispute against a multinational bank for its wrongful demand for repayment for the monies under the facility agreement (Singapore High Court)

  • Advising two Indonesian companies with respect to the validity of their performance guarantees under Indonesian law under a facility agreement governed by Singapore law (Indonesian courts)

  • Advising a South-Korean sovereign bank in their dispute with respect to the wrongful invocation of performance bank guarantee (Gujarat High Court, India)

Shipping & Insurance

Litigation

  • Advising a Singaporean company in charter party dispute against an Italian company (Singapore High Court)

Sports & Entertainment

Arbitration

  • Representing an Indian sports broadcasting joint venture company and its promoters in their dispute under a subscription and shareholders’ agreement against an American investor (SIAC Rules, India seated, Indian law) 

Others

  • Advising two Indian companies in their dispute against an American shoe manufacturing company, for invalid registration of its priorly published design.